Is Jane Seymour’s Plastic Surgery Hereditary?
British actress Jane Seymour’s 26-year old daughter Katie looks like she could be a sister of her 57-year old mother. So Make Me Heal wants to know if Katie will inherit more than just her mother’s natural beauty, and inherit her mom’s plastic surgery penchant as well.
Jane famously got breast implants which she displayed proudly for her topless scene in the comedy film Wedding Crashers (read the full story on Jane Seymour’s Breast Implants). But she got small ones, so that they wouldn’t seem too out of place on her thin frame. “My plastic surgeon had to special order them,” says Seymour. There are conflicting reports as to whether Seymour got her implants ten years ago, or right before the film Wedding Crashers.
Jane Seymour also admitted to having a blepharoplasty (eyelid surgery), telling People magazine, “Genetically I had baggy eyes, and photographers said they didn’t want to spend money endlessly having to eradicate the bags.” If the bags are genetic, it likely means there is an eyelid surgery in young Katie’s future as well.
Jane has also admitted to using Botox and considering liposuction.
But for now, the 57-year old actress isn’t interested in having any more work done. “I’ve never said I won’t,” the Daily Mail quoted her as saying. “But until I see a full facelift that doesn’t look like one, or Botox or cheekbone implants that look natural, I doubt I’ll be interested.”
While Jane looks great and nowhere near her age, her daughter Katie looks much more mature than 26, and Make Me Heal won’t be surprised to Katie Seymour go under the knife for breast implants and facial rejuvenation, just like her mother did.
Read the complete plastic surgery profile of Jane Seymour on Plasticopedia, the largest online celebrity plastic surgery encyclopedia.
none



















on June 26th, 2008 at 7:56 pm
Check your facts. In People Mag, Jane explained her breast implants were NOT done for the Wedding Crashers role but over 12 years ago just to recapture a little of what she lost after having had twins. Don’t twist things to sensationalize them.
on June 27th, 2008 at 4:20 pm
I second what Mary Ann said…check your facts!!!! Oh and while your at it…Katie’s surname is FLYNN, not Seymour, and Jane is now 57.
on June 28th, 2008 at 6:06 pm
I agree with Mary Ann and Renea. Check your facts first.
on June 29th, 2008 at 2:59 pm
bitch fight, could you 2 be any ruder?
on June 29th, 2008 at 3:27 pm
Hello everyone, Thanks for the clarification, as we’ve made the changes.
on July 4th, 2008 at 5:14 pm
‘a’, my former post was not meant to be rude in the least, only to matter-of-factly point out other inaccuracies in this article and to second the post of a friend.
Staff, thank you for updating this article.